Le 13/08/2015 12:26, Henry So Jr. a écrit :
> This was actually pretty painful to hear.  Windows-isms aside, I think
> this means that we need to target a more ancient C standard in order to
> prevent us from veering off as we continue development.  C89 perhaps?
> 
> C89 will force us to use older style comments, but I guess that's the
> price we pay for TeX Live?

I would go for the maximal subset of C99 making Visual Studio 2010
happy... So the main difference would be not to declare variables in for
statements, and add a custom stdbool.h if absent. Maybe a good idea
would be to use

https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/stdbool_002eh.html

What do you think?
-- 
Elie

_______________________________________________
Gregorio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel

Répondre à