> I played around a little more with this, and it seems that this > combination only does what we want in clang. I think the only clean > solution that is likely to work as compilers develop is to really switch > to C89 or gnu89 in fully pendantic mode.
This seems too much to me... For me just changing the declaration in loop statements would be enough, other such declarations in new code wouldn't be detected by our compiler warnings, but TeXLive won't use Visual Studio 2010 forever... What do you think? Thank you, -- Elie _______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
