I would be fine with renaming since the version is on the titlepage. -Br. Elijah
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Br. Samuel Springuel <[email protected] > wrote: > On 2016-05-10 1:53 PM, Manfred Lotz wrote: > >> Remark: >> For us it is unfortunate that the doc pdf is named >> gregoriotex/doc/GregorioRef-4_1_2.pdf because this means we have to >> adjust the doc entry in our database with each update of the package. >> >> Suggestion: Either call the file GregorioRef.pdf or Just maintain a >> symlink GregorioRef.pdf -> GregorioRef-4_1_2.pdf. In case of a symlink >> view the word 'maintain' in bold letters as it means you have to adjust >> for each update. Whatever you choose is fine with me. Thanks for your >> understanding. >> > > Given the above remark, do others have a preference for a symlink over > renaming the documentation in this context? My first instinct is to > rename, but I can do either fairly easily. > > -- > ✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝ > Br. Samuel, OSB > St. Anselm’s Abbey > Washington, DC > (R. Padraic Springuel) > > PAX ☧ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ > > _______________________________________________ > Gregorio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
