Hello,
I'd just suggest a small thing about color of symbols, for ℟. and ℣. : if
you renew commands \Rbar and \Vbar, you still have to color the dot after
them. If you know how to type ℟ and ℣ on your keyboard (or copy/paste
them), you can define those commands :
\catcode`\℣=\active \def ℣#1{{\color{rougeliturgique}\Vbar{}#1}}
\catcode`\℟=\active \def ℟#1{{\color{rougeliturgique}\Rbar{}#1}}
And then, in the gabc, type ℣. instead of <sp>V/</sp>. and so on.
In Christo,
Fr. Jacques Peron +
2014/1/7 Élie Roux <[email protected]>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you very much for your input!
>
> I've addressed this issue in current svn by adding the <c> markup. For
> example, with
>
> (c3) ab(gh) <c>cd</c>(gh) ef(gh)
>
> the text of the second syllable will be coloured. By default, the color
> is the same as the red lines, but you can change it by redefining the
> gregoriocolor color (see its definition in gregoriotex.sty).
>
> I also think Mr Maire's suggestion on how to make some symbols
> automatically colored is very good, as it doesn't "pollute" the gabc
> with edition-specifig things (and is thus better for inclusion in gabc
> databases).
>
> I strongly suggest that anyone using color for text use whether Mr
> Maire's method or the <c> markup, as a wrong usage of \color in TeX
> might break your documents with latest gregoriotex version.
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Elie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gregorio-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
>
_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
