Attached. As you can see, the \gresetinitiallines does not seem to to anything 
here.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Michael Martin
                     [email protected]
                    Thesaurus Precum Latinarum
                 http://www.preces-latinae.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: Main.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: Main.tex
Description: Binary data





> On Mar 6, 2016, at 5:42 PM, R. Padraic Springuel <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Can you provide a MWE which shows the problem. 
> 
> ✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝
> Br. Samuel, OSB
> (R. Padraic Springuel)
> PAX ☧ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ
> 
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Michael Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Br. Samuel Springuel <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Initial handling has been simplified.  This deprecates the `initial-style` 
>>> gabc header and the `biginitial` style.
>>> 
>>> Rather than using the `initial-style` gabc header, set the number of lines 
>>> the initial should use in Tex with the `\gresetinitiallines` command.  It 
>>> currently accepts 0 (for no initial), 1 (for a one-line initial), or 2 (for 
>>> a two-line initial).
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> I've installed 4.1 (via git, recompiled and installed under OSX). In the 
>> past I had been using the now-deprecated `initial-style` line in the gabc 
>> header and it worked fine (r 4.0). Seeing the message that the command is 
>> now deprecated, I switched over to \gresetinitiallines{0} to remove the 
>> initial space at the start of the chant.
>> 
>> Unfortunately \gresetinitiallines does not seem to work for me. Setting 
>> \gresetinitiallines{0} does not remove the space for the initial. Oddly, I 
>> can set \gresetinitiallines to anything I want, even 
>> \gresetinitiallines{zork} and it does not affect the output, or even 
>> generate an error message.
>> 
>> So no matter what I do, I cannot get my no-intial chants lined up properly. 
>> As to leaving the deprecated form in, that seems to result in a hit-or-miss 
>> in getting the correct alignment. Some align correctly, others do not. This 
>> was, BYW, working fine under 4.0.
>> 
>> Is there something I am missing with the 4.1 release?
>> 
>> <Screen Shot 2016-03-06 at 4.20.33 PM.png>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                           Michael Martin
>>                      [email protected]
>>                     Thesaurus Precum Latinarum
>>                  http://www.preces-latinae.org
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gregorio-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
> _______________________________________________
> Gregorio-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users

_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users

Reply via email to