Thank you Henry for letting me know. I think there is another option to handle the situation: just avoid the happening of this case by pushing out the last note(s) to the next staff line or pulling in the next note(s). I don't know how easy/difficult to implement since theoretically there might also be some corner cases to handle, e.g. consecutive flat notes, although they are very rare. Probably it can be the first try to push out or pull in only one note; if it turns out to be difficult, then add an accidental before the custos.
Just my two-cents. Michael ________________________________________ 发件人: Henry So Jr. <[email protected]> 发送时间: 2016年5月30日 20:28 收件人: Zhang Michael 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: [Gregorio-users] Custos followed by accidental On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 09:32:08 am +0000, Zhang Michael wrote: > Dear all, > > > There can be an occasion where the note prompted by a custos (i.e. the first > note of the next staff line) is a flat-ti. The Gregorio does nothing special > in this case, which I personally feel that the result is somewhat misleading > - I thought an accidental should also be placed before the custos in order to > indicate the right pitch of the next note. However, I didn't find such a case > in Graduale Romanum (is it specially avoided?) to support either behavior. > > > So the question is: with the square notation, should an accidental be placed > before the custos when the first note of the next staff line is actually an > accidental? > > > Thanks, > > > Michael Zhang > > Shanghai, China Dear Michael, A feature is coming in 4.2 to do just this. See https://github.com/gregorio-project/gregorio/issues/1049. Regards, Henry _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
