My bad. Of course I meant <marker/>. IMHO both should be valid as <br> and <br/> are valid in HTML5 (see: http://stackoverflow.com/a/1946452)
2016-05-31 0:34 GMT+02:00 Henry T. So Jr. <[email protected]>: > </marker> in this context is incorrect syntax, so if we go that route, > this will be flagged as an error. > > Henry > > On May 30, 2016 4:45:01 PM "CieMaKat ." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How much more work would it take to make both <marker> and </marker> >> valid? >> >> 2016-05-30 21:26 GMT+02:00 Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>: >> >>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Abbazia Mater Ecclesiae wrote: >>> > I agree with Henry: I prefer the new $...$ syntax. >>> >>> What I don't like on the $ choice is that it makes another character >>> special, one that also has special meaning in TeX (e.g. for math stuff) >>> and/or could be (sure, very rarely) be used somewhere in the syllable. >>> Keeping the number of special characters that need quoting to a minimum >>> is >>> IMHO worthwhile. >>> >>> Jakub >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gregorio-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *M.Ciesiółka* >> _______________________________________________ >> Gregorio-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users >> > -- *M.Ciesiółka*
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
