Thinking another way around, why not use some generic syntax like <config>setting_1[,setting_2[,...setting_n]]</config> instead of creating new markups every time we have a new request, while keep the markup consistent.
So the "clear" signal (and the alike in the future) can be marked up as: <config>clear</config>. A little lengthy though but I'm not an expert of naming :). Thanks, Michael ________________________________________ 发件人: Henry T. So Jr. <[email protected]> 发送时间: 2016年5月31日 1:33 收件人: Zhang Michael; [email protected] 主题: Re: 答复: [Gregorio-users] Gabc syntax for "markers" </marker> is actually invalid, and must be rejected as an error because tolerating it imparts a false meaning to a file that has it. This is the exact reason using an entirely different syntax is on the table, so that people are not tempted to do invalid things like that. Henry On May 30, 2016 12:55:02 PM Zhang Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm in favor of option 1 <marker> except that I think </marker> can be > tolerated as kind of "retrograded" but valid syntax, and it is simply > ignored by the parser. > > Thanks, > Michael > > ________________________________________ > 发件人: Gregorio-users <[email protected]> 代表 Henry So Jr. > <[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2016年5月30日 20:37 > 收件人: [email protected] > 主题: [Gregorio-users] Gabc syntax for "markers" > > Dear all, > > The developers are working on a couple of features that will require > "markers" to be placed in syllable text. > > For context, see > > https://github.com/gregorio-project/gregorio/issues/1029 > > and > > https://github.com/gregorio-project/gregorio/issues/931. > > These two features will require some kind of "marker" to be placed in > gabc, but unlike the current tags (like <b>...</b>), these "markers" > don't need to (and should not) be closed. > > The developers are at an impasse as to the best notation for this. > There are three options: > > - <marker> (with no (</marker>), which may confuse people used to XML) > - <marker/> (this is XML-like, but may be hard to remember) > - $marker$ (which makes it obvious this is different, but is different) > > Does anyone on the list have an opinion on which form they find least > confusing/difficult-to-use? > > Thanks, > Henry > > _______________________________________________ > Gregorio-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
