I rank the accessibility nees like this:
1. Speakup kernel modules
2. Braille support (brltty)
3. Software speech (espeak and espeakup)
4. Beet when boot is finished
The reason i rank braille ahead of software speech is for deaf/blind systems
administrators. If you're blind, you can get a hardware synth but if ther is
no braille support, systems admins who are both deaf and blind are out of
luck.
I hope people don't think I'm exaggerating when I talk about people losing
their jobs due to accessibility problems. Being a blind systems
administrator is a constant struggle with accessibility problems. How do I
install Windows 7? Is the new VMWare interface accessible? How do I rescue a
crashed machine? I'm not saying someone would get fired right on the spot if
their grml CD doesn't speak. But what happens is that tasks like installing
Win7 and rescuing crashed systems get assigned to other people. When
layoffs come around, the blind systems administrator is the one to go
because he is the least important member of the team.
I know grml can't be all things to all people. But I would hope the grml
developers would be at least hesitant to add another brick to the wall of
accessibility problems disabled systems administrators struggle to climb
over every day.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whapples" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Grml] How are blind grml users handling
currentwebtechnologies?
John, I would agree with the list of what would be needed (personal view).
The only additional one I can imagine some might ask for might be
emacspeak, however possibly should that be included on a live CD, I would
probably go with not really as speakup can work (may be not as well) with
emacs or vim, so its not like you are lacking access to a decent editor.
Anyway, should emacspeak be desired then it could be downloaded, or may be
its something for a custom GRML CD.
Also, I don't know that I could commit to testing every release (as I
mentioned speakup in ArchLinux is not working on my computers and I think
its a speakup issue not a issue with the packaging) but may be let us know
here on this list as well when you want testing of accessibility and I
will do what I can.
Michael Whapples
On -10/01/37 20:59, John G. Heim wrote:
From: "Christian Hofstaedtler" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Can you (or someone else interested in this) draft a list of things
we would need to do/ship to actually have working accesibility support
<> (for you)?
This includes everything that might be there right now. I myself
have never seen such a setup, so please be explicit.
I'd better ask around before I give you a definative list. I think I know
what to tell you but I'll check it out to make sure. I own a hardware
speech synthesizer so I think for me, just including the speakup kernel
modules would be enough. And that code is now in the mainstream kernel
code. You don't have to do anything but check the boxes for it when
you're configuring a kernel.
On a debian system, to get software speech, you need the speakup modules
and you need to install two packages, espeak and espeakup. To get
braille, you need the brltty package.
accessibility, I assume it's not really useful to actually have the
software on the ISO at all; so not having QA here is not really an
option.
I will do that. All I'll need is to be notified when I need to test.
I'm guessing that it wouldn't be a problem if it took me a few days to
get to it. I mean, sometimes I take vacation. But most of the time, if I
was notified that I had to test a new version, I would get to it within
24 hours. And I'll be a good tester. I can use my employers resources to
test so you'll never hear from me something like I couldn't get to it
because my network connection was down. And I have a hardware speech
synthesizer and a braille display. So I could test the full range of
accessibility features.
If somebody steps up to do the work and/or the list, we might
reconsider.
Well, you've already got somebody. I'm not the most knowledgable grml
user in the world. I've used only the live CD as a rescue disk. But I
have plenty of hardware that I can install grml on. I don't know if I'll
need a machine with grml installed to the disk but I can set that up
tonight. And I'll start asking around to make sure I know what to tell
you to include.
_______________________________________________
Grml mailing list - [email protected]
http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml
join #grml on irc.freenode.org
grml-devel-blog:
_______________________________________________
Grml mailing list - [email protected]
http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml
join #grml on irc.freenode.org
grml-devel-blog:
