From: "Christian Hofstaedtler" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
We don't think nobody uses this. On the other hand we clearly see
that none of the developers has personal use for accessibility, and
we do not receive contributions (development and QA) from this user
group.
I agree with what M.W. said that its been working so well there has been no
reason to comment on it. I've been on this list for years and other than to
ask some questions about re-mastering, I haven't commented at all.
But I'm guessing that the fact that the speakup code is now in the vanilla
kernel source changes things, right? You don't have to pull it from git any
more. All you have to do is check the boxes for the speakup modules when
compiling your kernel. It'll take up some space but given the importance of
these modules to some people, I'd think you'd want to do that.
Christian, are you in a position to make a policy decision on this issue? I
think you should consider including brltty, espeak, and espeakup on the disk
for reasons I talked about at length in another message. But my opinion is
that including the speakup modules should be a sure thing. I'd be very
disappointed if you decide against that at least.
_______________________________________________
Grml mailing list - [email protected]
http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml
join #grml on irc.freenode.org
grml-devel-blog:
