* Marc Haber [Thu Aug 31, 2017 at 03:56:48PM +0200]: > to reproduce a bug, I would like to build a local grml image as similiar > as possible to grml64-full.2017.05.iso.
> How do I find out which FAI classes were used to build the image to give > the exact same list to grml-live's -c option? Is that information inside > the ISO and/or accessible from the booted grml? The best we currently have are the build logs, e.g. https://jenkins.grml.org/job/grml64-full_Release/32/console has the details for the grml64-full.2017.05 ISO. So it was generated using the following classes: DEBORPHAN,GRMLBASE,GRML_FULL,RELEASE,AMD64,IGNORE,SNAPSHOT This raises an interesting issue, it might be nice to include such build information inside the ISO itself by default. What about something like: % jo build_date="$(TZ=UTC date +%s)" grml_live_classes=DEBORPHAN,GRMLBASE,GRML_FULL,RELEASE,AMD64,IGNORE,SNAPSHOT grml_live_version=0.30.2 build_tool=grml-live debian_release=stretch grml_live_options="-F -V -A" architecture=amd64 grml_version=build2065 debian_release=autobuild-build2065 grml_name=grml64-full_sid build_host="jenkins.grml.org" | jq -S '.' { "architecture": "amd64", "build_date": 1504206859, "build_host": "jenkins.grml.org", "build_tool": "grml-live", "debian_release": "autobuild-build2065", "grml_live_classes": "DEBORPHAN,GRMLBASE,GRML_FULL,RELEASE,AMD64,IGNORE,SNAPSHOT", "grml_live_options": "-F -V -A", "grml_live_version": "0.30.2", "grml_name": "grml64-full_sid", "grml_version": "build2065" } put into /GRML/buildinfo.json or so on the ISO? regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - [email protected] http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://blog.grml.org/
