* Marc Haber [Sun Sep 03, 2017 at 06:37:42PM +0200]: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:16:38PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > What about something like:
> > % jo build_date="$(TZ=UTC date +%s)"
> > grml_live_classes=DEBORPHAN,GRMLBASE,GRML_FULL,RELEASE,AMD64,IGNORE,SNAPSHOT
> > grml_live_version=0.30.2 build_tool=grml-live debian_release=stretch
> > grml_live_options="-F -V -A" architecture=amd64 grml_version=build2065
> > debian_release=autobuild-build2065 grml_name=grml64-full_sid
> > build_host="jenkins.grml.org" | jq -S '.'
> > {
> > "architecture": "amd64",
> > "build_date": 1504206859,
> > "build_host": "jenkins.grml.org",
> > "build_tool": "grml-live",
> > "debian_release": "autobuild-build2065",
> > "grml_live_classes":
> > "DEBORPHAN,GRMLBASE,GRML_FULL,RELEASE,AMD64,IGNORE,SNAPSHOT",
> > "grml_live_options": "-F -V -A",
> > "grml_live_version": "0.30.2",
> > "grml_name": "grml64-full_sid",
> > "grml_version": "build2065"
> > }
> > put into /GRML/buildinfo.json or so on the ISO?
> Looks nearly perfect. A personal preference might be that I'd prefer a
> human-readable date as build_data and the snapshot, if it's important in
> the first place, the epoch timestamp in another variable.
What do you mean with "snapshot" here? Can you please provide a full
example of what you'd like to have?
> And probably the suite is missing.
I think I just used the wrong argument for debian_release in my example. :)
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - [email protected] http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://blog.grml.org/
