On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:33:43PM +0200, Bernd Warken wrote: > > > Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 22.08.05 16:26:08: > > > > > Isn't there a possibility to change `groff' such that it is not > > > necessary to redefine .TS and .TE? > > > > Please elaborate. > > The `groff' .TS and .TE could be such that the text goes around a table in a > nice way. Maybe you could use your redefinitions in the original > definitions. I hope that I understood that right. >
Provided that this is what the user wants. I always want my tables just where I put them, and I certainly don't want new macros to suddenly change the page layout of old books or papers. I'm all for having this capability available, but let's make sure it doesn't ``break'' existing documents. Even a heuristic such as ``flow data around the table if the text before doesn't end a sentence'' may not be what someone wants. Perhaps a different macro, or a new argument to .TS to invoke the behavior is what we want. Or am I just misunderstanding what you're asking for here? jcs _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
