Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After some thinking I now believe that it is better to fold the > preconv preprocessor into soelim. The reasons are obvious: Any `.so' > request should be handled by preconv too -- the alternative is to make > soelim call preconv, but I have the feeling that this is a bad idea, > given the many hassles with pipes on non-Unix platforms. > > I further believe that the `.mso' request should *not* be involved in > encoding conversion issues. > > Comments?
Hi Werner, sounds like an excellent idea - my only slight worry is that `.mso' is treated differently to `.so' as it would force `.mso' to be only used to include macros rather than text. Just wondering what happens if text needs to be encoded within something.tmac ? Gaius _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
