> > I further believe that the `.mso' request should *not* be involved in
> > encoding conversion issues.
>
> sounds like an excellent idea - my only slight worry is that `.mso'
> is treated differently to `.so' as it would force `.mso' to be only
> used to include macros rather than text. Just wondering what happens
> if text needs to be encoded within something.tmac ?
Remember that .mso isn't handled by soelim at all. On the other hand,
there shouldn't be a great problem to convert a file to be included
with a call to .mso in advance.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
