Werner Lemberg: > > > I don't think so. .DEVTAG-EO-H is very low- > > > level (and since of its beta nature, neither > > > .tag nor .taga are documented at all); it's a > > > bad idea IMHO to hardcode any typographical > > > behaviour with it. > > > > I still cannot agree with it, because the modi- > > fication in question is the removal of a side- > > effect, not the addition of new behaviour. > > OK, let's fix this as you suggest.
Attached is a patch for devtag.tmac. I wasn't sure about the naming of strings intended for local use (tag-request) and of the macro (TAG). The patch for m.tmac was attached to my previous massage, so use what you think is better. Anton
devtag.tmac.diff
Description: Binary data
