Werner Lemberg:
> This patch I actually dislike since it essentially
> means that after DEVTAG there is always a line
> break, which is too strong an assumption
There's no such assumption.
-- If a call to DEVTAG is followed by a break then
its side effect is eliminated.
-- If a call to DEVTAG is not followed by a break
then there's no side effect.
All the difference between the two patches is the
area of application. The first one only deals with a
couple of calls from m.tmac while the second one
ensures that every call to DEVTAG or DEVTAG-NEXT
does not produce said side effect. They work essen-
tially the same way, using the fix you provided.
I have tested both patches against the same test
file in which both cases (with and without .br) are
mentioned, and they gave identical resutls.
Anton
