On Sun, Jan 08, 2012, Werner Lemberg wrote: > Yes. It's probably heretic to say but for serious typography Heirloom > troff offers much more possibilities.
Not heretical at all, merely true, as Pierre-Jean's example demonstrates. How radically different is Heirloom troff's code from groff's? Is there anything in groff that would conflict with implementations of .padj, .minss and .letadj? Their absence, or the absence of analogous requests, strikes me as a major stumbling block in groff. -- Peter Schaffter Author of The Binbrook Caucus http://www.schaffter.ca
