On Mar 21, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Romascanu, Dan ((Dan)) wrote:
Thanks for the inputs (and please continue to send them flowing in).
As co-AD I recognize the overhead involved in shutting down a WG and
opening a new one in the same problems space, while there seems to
be a
rather widely shared feeling that the work is not done. At the same
time
I would like to draw the attention to the fact that without active
participation (which we missed in the last year at least) the work
will
continue not to be done, whatever framework the IESG provides. I am
taking the inputs of the participants in the thread as an
expression of
interest that I appreciate and I hope that it will be backed-up by
active particpation in this work whatever form we decide to continue.
Dan
I just speak for myself: it is my fault for failing my report
duty for the measurement results we have been continuing to collect,
as I did during '04--'05.
I'll fix it
Lixia
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:26 AM
To: Lixia Zhang
Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]; Luca Martini; Ron Bonica
Subject: Re: [GROW] Proposal to close grow working group
hi
my 2 cents here
that exactly the point, i was at the IEPG on sunday morning
and there is a need for better understanding the BGP routing
operations and evolutions
a couple of crisp points have been identified (that are not
linked to the usual protocol dev phases) related to the
current and future BGP routing operations, in addition to the
modelling and experimentation aspects
GROW is the place of choice for such investigations, having
this group in place now, why should IESG demote and then
promote again this group in another form and not just
adapt/re-charter ?
thanks,
-d.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
