It would be very good to capture the discussion from today's WG meeting about this document here, on-list. Would Rudiger and Dan be willing to bring their discussion here in the next few days?
A quick summary was that processing time and storage expenses are tradeoffs that XML formatting may bring as opposed to the current binary formatting in MRT of the data. Additionally there was some discussion on 'what is important to capture' in the XML format. I believe Dan had also mentioned (perhaps not in the WG meeting) that there would be a common/available toolset to convert from MRT -> XML and XML -> MRT, so in the case where you have legacy data stores you could plan to process via a common pipeline regardless of the data format you choose going forward. -Chris _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
