> Additionally there was some discussion on 'what is important to
> capture' in the XML format. I believe Dan had also mentioned (perhaps
> not in the WG meeting) that there would be a common/available toolset
> to convert from MRT -> XML and XML -> MRT, so in the case where you
> have legacy data stores you could plan to process via a common
> pipeline regardless of the data format you choose going forward.

        heas has already written MRT -> 'sh ip bgp' (that's how
        we're generating 'sh ip bgp' format data these days). So
        if we have XML->MRT, then we can generate all formats in
        use today from the XML. That would be a great step forward.

        Dave

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to