On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:06 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:

I think the comment in quotes above demonstrates that at worst, ACCEPT_OWN is tangential to your RR beef.

Unless implementations change their behavior to support this,
which is why I keep associating it.  But yes, in general, I
agree.

Suppose the RR spec was changed to mandate suppression of own routes being sent back to their originators -- in that case I think we'd be happy to update the ACCEPT_OWN spec as you describe, to explicitly permit sending just the special routes back to their originators. Of course it was unnecessary to spec this in the ACCEPT_OWN doc since as you point out, reality is that the routes are sent anyway.

Agreed..

So, I agree with Robert (and I think you do too) that this is a distraction from your primary point.

Noted.

-danny

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to