On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:06 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
I think the comment in quotes above demonstrates that at worst, ACCEPT_OWN is tangential to your RR beef.
Unless implementations change their behavior to support this, which is why I keep associating it. But yes, in general, I agree.
Suppose the RR spec was changed to mandate suppression of own routes being sent back to their originators -- in that case I think we'd be happy to update the ACCEPT_OWN spec as you describe, to explicitly permit sending just the special routes back to their originators. Of course it was unnecessary to spec this in the ACCEPT_OWN doc since as you point out, reality is that the routes are sent anyway.
Agreed..
So, I agree with Robert (and I think you do too) that this is a distraction from your primary point.
Noted. -danny _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
