On 27 mrt 2009, at 3:43, Shane Amante wrote:
Re: your comment on "breaking groupwise processing" ... don't RR's
already have to account for not sending updates to a specific peer
(or, set of peers) based on various ORF types they've received from
that peer (assuming ORF's are enabled)? Why can't that same code/
logic apply here (i.e.: it's already written, why can't we re-use it
here)?
Hm, aren't filters on iBGP sessions considered bad style?
I don't know what implementations do when peer group members send
ORFs, but it wouldn't surprise me to learn that this would make the
peer group processing advantages disappear.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
