Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:21:56AM -0700, David Meyer: > > Additionally there was some discussion on 'what is important to > > capture' in the XML format. I believe Dan had also mentioned (perhaps > > not in the WG meeting) that there would be a common/available toolset > > to convert from MRT -> XML and XML -> MRT, so in the case where you > > have legacy data stores you could plan to process via a common > > pipeline regardless of the data format you choose going forward. > > heas has already written MRT -> 'sh ip bgp' (that's how > we're generating 'sh ip bgp' format data these days). So > if we have XML->MRT, then we can generate all formats in > use today from the XML. That would be a great step forward.
I believe MRT is far more manageable for this data. smaller, faster, easier to deal with programmatically. I'd go the other direction; generate whatever format you want from the MRT. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
