Hi all, I support this document as it indeed may be an interesting tool to move our architectures towards multiple BGP paths announcements with add-paths support at the end.
I however find it difficult to comment the document and make it progressing as we still don't have a clear view on a standard and shared "n-best paths calculation" (with n>1) algorithm. Regards, -- Greg > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De > la part de Peter Schoenmaker > Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 22:32 > À : [email protected] > Objet : [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working > group document > > Hello, > > At the Stockholm IETF Robert Raszuk presented the draft on > distribution of diverse BGP paths. The question was put at > the session on whether to adopt this document as working > group document. > > I would like to get the feedback of the list on if we should > adopt this document. > > Thanks > > Peter -- Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
