Hi Greg,
Many thx for your comment and support.
Reg the Nth path selection algorithm I think this is pretty clear and
published already in other draft (see below). I did not wanted to repeat
it here, but if you think that such clarification is required it will be
great comment to add.
Section 5:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pmohapat-idr-fast-conn-restore-00
Many thx,
R.
Hi all,
I support this document as it indeed may be an interesting tool to move our
architectures towards multiple BGP paths announcements with add-paths support
at the end.
I however find it difficult to comment the document and make it progressing as we still
don't have a clear view on a standard and shared "n-best paths calculation" (with
n>1) algorithm.
Regards,
--
Greg
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De
la part de Peter Schoenmaker
Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 22:32
À : [email protected]
Objet : [GROW] draft-raszuk-diverse-bgp-path-dist-01 working
group document
Hello,
At the Stockholm IETF Robert Raszuk presented the draft on
distribution of diverse BGP paths. The question was put at
the session on whether to adopt this document as working
group document.
I would like to get the feedback of the list on if we should
adopt this document.
Thanks
Peter -- Chris
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
