Hi Terry, > > I just don't see the complexity. Its an extra column that specifies the > routing intent[1], and gives a clear signal if anything should change, for > example the 'future use' blocks or 6to4 (without rehashing that escapade).
And I still don't see the point of adornment of an IANA Address Allocation registry with this additional field. My earlier comments objecting to this draft, as related in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg01999.html, noting issues of charter scope, IAB roles and institutional overlap of IANA contractor staff are unaltered after reading through the example and the followup conversations. regards, Geoff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
