in the vein of 'new deployment folks may want to shortcut all of the bad lessons everyone else learned'
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Leo Bicknell <[email protected]> wrote: > So the question to ask is, do we have a good reason to strongly > encourage all new Anycast deployments to be in this model, as opposed to > the alternative models? keep in mind that 'enterprises' may be deploying anycast services inside their wan's, NOT publicly visible... What advice would you give them in such a situation? I suppose my point is/was/will-be that documenting a path that's not insane, works, could help new folks isn't bad. I agree that there are 2-3-17 ways this is currently deployed, each has their similarities, troublepoints and wins... I fall back on the fact that most of these are operated by very smart folk who know the innards of their deployment/scenario (and the larger internet in most cases) very, very well. As you say leo, telling them 'change your ways!!' is just not sensible. -chris (keeping in mind that often enterprise IT folks are not super-bgp-ninjas like leo...) _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
