On 17/11/2011 07:30, Christopher Morrow wrote: > As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to > read/review/think-about the subject draft: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-07>
In fact, this ID is now at revision -08. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-08 Is it worth mentioning that NAT will break multisession bgp? Before everyone cries in horror, bgp does occasionally get configured through NAT devices. I'm aware that this isn't particularly a private addressing issue, but it is slightly tangentially related. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
