On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, t.petch <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris > > Are you able to declare a consensus on this? I believe that we are now past > "12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)" >
we are past that date... by a bit :( calendar failure. everyone seems to have supported it, no disenting issues and even some people claiming fix actions, w00t! so this seems as though it's a WG doc now. I'll ask the author(s) to spin a new copy of the current draft (feel free to fix up some things about the as112 notes in the call) as a WG doc something like: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores seems right? -chris (thanks for the nudge tom!) > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Morrow" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:30 AM > > >> Folks, >> As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to >> read/review/think-about the subject draft: >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-07> >> >> Anthony et-al have done some good work documenting some practices for >> operators, if the work seems to be relevant for this group, let's hear >> that and we'll adopt the document. If, on the other hand, we believe >> this belongs elsewhere, let's provide a pointer set to the authors. >> >> Call for this ends: 12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks) >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> (co-chair) >> >> > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
