What do you guys think about updating the draft to support TCP sessions initiated by the receiver to the router? In our environment, we NAT and FW the BMP server and it's somewhat problematic since we have to build a static NAT for the BMP server and open a FW rule from the outside in. It would make things a lot simpler if the BMP server (receiver) could establish the TCP connection to the router, which may go through PAT.
--Tim
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
