On Apr 17, 2012, at 02:24 , Christopher Morrow wrote: > I'm not sure that being able to track repeats is really necessary > though, if one speaker is +10% bad (pick a percent) over the last 5 > mins (or 500 update messages, perhaps this is a chance for a knob for > either/both/mix) shutdown the session and keep it down (or bounce and > re-establish and after X bounces in Y time, shutdown) >
I'd propose a variation of above: if number of prefix in "bad update" is higher than configured X% of all prefixes (alternatively - 'of best path') learned from this peer (regardless of time) then reset session. If X configured to be 100, then effectively it means "never drop this session" (unless really all that this peer sends is bad). /iLya _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
