> But then the overhead become untenable.
So why not event driven rsync like mechanism between BGP_Adj_Ribs for
incremental updates ? *well for VPNs RTC would need to be mandatory*
Note that RPKI is rsync based which some suggest for BGP to relay on
anyway ;)
r.
On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
I guess the fact that we use TCP for BGP is sort of legacy and
perhaps the more Shakespeare we put in BGP (on 179 or different
instance) we should revisit how we transport the UPDATE messages
betwen BGP peers.
Before you go there, you need to ask yourself if you want to continue
to have a protocol with incremental updates. TCP is there precisely
to support that.
If you want to go back to periodic updates, then getting rid of TCP
seems much more credible.
But then the overhead become untenable.
Tony
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
