On 17/05/2012 17:11, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Thanks for introducing this document! > > I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following documents > that are working in OPSEC: > > - draft-behringer-lla-only > - draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address > > To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one > another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it is > not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are being > considered in different WGs.
yes, certainly draft-behringer and draft-grow are discussing a substantially similar issue - namely using non-routable interface addresses in the core. tbh, it's not really possible to manage a network without traceroute and remote interface ping. Wes George posted a more complete response here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02191.html I agree fully with his analysis on all points. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
