Tom, AFAIKS, the WGLC that Chris suggested in the email below can proceed:
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02263.html The updates that Chris requested seem to be addressed in the two versions that have been posted since then. Chris, do you agree? Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: t.petch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:24 AM > To: Ronald Bonica; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ronald Bonica" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:11 PM > > Folks, > > > > Thanks for introducing this document! > > > > I would like to bring the authors' attention to the following > documents that are working in OPSEC: > > > > - draft-behringer-lla-only > > - draft-baker-opsec-passive-ip-address > > > > To some extent, draft-grow and draft-behringer are debating with one > another. While draft-baker is not directly involved in the debate, it > is not uninvolved, either. It is a shame that the three documents are > being considered in different WGs. > > I think it a bigger shame that draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores is > not in the RFC Editor queue awaiting publication! > > It is a natural companion to RFC6598 and could have, should have, been > in the queue at the same time. This I-D was relevant when it was first > written 2 years ago, and I see its relevance decreasing with time, as > people stumble over the mistakes that this I-D could have prevented. > It has taken those 2 years to get this I-D IETF-ready, little has > changed in the content in that time, and it is time we got it out of > the door. > > Of course there is scope for improvement, there always is, but that is > an argument for never publishing anything. If the authors of the other > I-Ds want to build on it, then of course they can produce a bis that > covers more, but let's publish what we have got. > > Tom Petch > > > > > For the purpose of discussing these three documents, I think that a > little cross-posting is acceptable. > > > > -------------------------- > > Ron Bonica > > vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GROW mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
