I would like to see this published as an RFC. The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have an initial capital - I think that it should.
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Morrow" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM > Folks, > There's been work on the draft: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores> > > I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors. > Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012). > > Abstract of the draft: > "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the > potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally- > routable addressing within the core of an SP network. The discussion > focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses. > While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP > community, there appears to be no document that collectively > describes the issues." > > Could there be some discussion on WGLC and we'll see about moving > this along to the IESG? > > -chris > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
