On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:06 AM, t.petch wrote: > I would like to see this published as an RFC. >
Yah, me too… W > The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have > an initial capital - I think that it should. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Morrow" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM >> Folks, >> There's been work on the draft: >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores> >> >> I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors. >> Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012). >> >> Abstract of the draft: >> "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the >> potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally- >> routable addressing within the core of an SP network. The > discussion >> focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses. >> While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP >> community, there appears to be no document that collectively >> describes the issues." >> >> Could there be some discussion on WGLC and we'll see about moving >> this along to the IESG? >> >> -chris >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >> > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > -- With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
