On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Rob Shakir <[email protected]> wrote: > If we tear down the session based on a single bad UPDATE, then Bad Things™ > happen.
This is why I'm confused why you aren't more interested in giving the vendor (ultimately, the operator) the choice to simply ignore bad updates. You know that error-handling already leaves the RIB (network) in a bad state. You might as well give the option to reset the session under even fewer circumstances. -- Jeff S Wheeler <[email protected]> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
