in the vein of suggestions, in section 5.1:
  "Furthermore, the NRTM protocol does not
   employ any security mechanisms.  The NRTM protocol relies on a pull
   mechanism and is generally is configured with a poll interval of 5 to
   10 minutes."

the second sentence doesn't parse all that well, extra 'is' perhaps?
also, no validation/security on the protocol seems sketchy, but I
guess that's part of the point of pointing it out.

I'm also not sure this matters:
  "Cache locality results in reduced
   bandwidth utilization for each round trip."

and it's not actually the case, the same bandwidth is used, just not
across AS boundaries (perhaps)... It's probably the case though that
the lookups are 'faster' as RTT is generally lower (probably) for the
cached copy lookups and server capacity-planning can be managed such
that there aren't contention issues on the cached copies.  (the same
comment about bandwidth appears further up in section 5.1, it's also
mostly irrelevant there as well, I think)

-chris


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Christopher Morrow
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Working Group Folks:
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations would
> like to bring the draft to WGLC, this is that LC. Please have a read
> through:
>
>   
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations/?include_text=1>
>
> Who's abstract is:
>   "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>    the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>    routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>    system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>    discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>    practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>    applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>    filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
>
> and raise questions/comments/suggestions/eggs on this list.
>
> I expect this WGLC to last for the normal 2wk period ending:
>   26-May-2014
>
> -chris
> grow-co-chair

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to