Thanks for the comments Wes! On May 12, 2014, at 4:54 PM, "George, Wes" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the authors need to look at this > http://iepg.org/2014-03-02-ietf89/ietf89_iepg_jmauch.pdf and make some > updates to section 7. Doesn’t really seem like all of those problems are > historical. Added that citation and some text, thanks! > It would be extremely helpful to have a summary or conclusion section that > makes it clearer which problems are still in need of a solution, > especially if the goal is to have IETF provide all or part of that > solution. I think that it is useful to categorize the problems into things > that are essentially old, solved problems and therefore used as FUD > objections vs things that are still known issues, but a clearer call to > action to resolve the still outstanding issues would make this draft much > stronger. Added, thanks! > Draft also needs text in the security considerations section. Added, thanks! > Lastly, why is this a standards-track document and not informational? Fixed! Eric
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
