On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Communities are not sent by default (eg Cisco). Route leaks come for free > on Cisco too. > Right, I meant "intentionally implemented" communities. Anyway, so the idea is to introduce a new knob that's on by default and which is more resistant to breaking off? Not so compelling to me as to warrant a wholesale protocol extension. Tony > On Jul 25, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Tony Tauber <[email protected]> wrote: > > How is this different than tagging with communities today? > In either case, the provider's correct action on the semantics is needed > (and can go awry through misconfiguration). > > Tony > >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
