Hi,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:11:41AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> So, some folk thought: "Hey, not announcing my aggregate and not
> providing connectivity between the aggregate announcement and the
> little islands I created is a grand plan!" and were surprised when
> things went badly...
>
> Do you want a document that says:
> "Sure, announce your aggregate as a bunch of de-aggs, and be sure
> there's a fall back ASIDE FROM ::/0 which has reachability to your
> islands, if you want to be sure to not run afoul of random isp route
> filtering."
A strong message to that extent would be good :-) - coupled with
some recommendations how the conflicting goals ("I want all ISPs in
my neighbourhood to use optimal routing" vs. "someone in Asia might
not be interested in all in 5k routes for german municipality")
could be solved.
I get that question fairly often from "largish networks", and so far,
I always have to answer "there is no routing police, so it's hard to
say what is allowed on the Internet and what not" - which is a humorous
way to say "there is no consensus here what consists 'good' and
'responsible'"...
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
