Hi, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:05:07PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 16/10/2014 16:47, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > Growth in IPv6 more specifics was 57% last year... > > 1y is an interesting data point, but shouldn't form the basis for a new > policy. What does the aggregate:more-specifics ratio look like over the > last 5-8 years?
http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/weekly/2014/41/ has a breakdown "last year" and "last 5 years" of "LIR exact", "LIR more-specific", "non-LIR" (=PI), "non-LIR more-specifics" - look for the heading "Routing Table by Class of Prefix". The "LIR exact" curve is fairly linear, while the "more specific" curve is growing stronger than linear. No predictions here, though. (You've propably seen this slide deck before - it's the "IPv6 routing table talk" numbers fed into a daily-updated cronjob) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
