On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:23:07PM +0200, Jon Mitchell wrote: > > Comment at the mic from today’s GROW session: > > > > Please be mindful of “prior art” (as Joel Jaggeli described it) regarding > > the use of AS65535. > > > > RFC7300 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7300 > > I believe this draft's use of well known community assignment is inline with > RFC7300 comments and the correct FCFS space of the registry but a reference > to 7300 may be useful if the text in section 4 is planned to remain post > publication.
I didn't make it to the grow session, but I'm also supportive of this becoming a well-known community. One thing I'd recommend for the draft is explicit discussion about the scope of the community and its expected propagation characteristics. The simple fact is that even with some implementations or operators who strip this community themselves for scope, it'll leak. Plan for the leak operationally. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
