> On 28 Jul 2015, at 17:34, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: …
> One thing I'd recommend for the draft is explicit discussion about the scope > of the community and its expected propagation characteristics. I just uploaded a revised version of the draft. It contains an overhauled section 3 (Operational Recommendations). Does this contain what you recommended? > The simple > fact is that even with some implementations or operators who strip this > community themselves for scope, it'll leak. Plan for the leak > operationally. We did - we changed “3.2. Local Scope of Blackholes” so that a BGP speaker receiving an BGP announcement tagged with the BLACKHOLE community SHOULD add a NO_ADVERTISE, NO_EXPORT or similar communities. Best regards, Thomas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
