>> I do not feel comfortable overloading locally administrated bits with >> something that represents global significance. The 64xxx communites >> come dangerously close to codepoints we use internally. I'd prefer >> that the local portion of BGP Communities remains truely local. > > only problem is that completely blows the purpose of the exercise, a > global tagging to help ops and researchers be more sure of what they > are seeing in the collectors.
i think i misunderstood you. you are suggesting using 42-44 or whatever, not 65000 space. sure. i do not care what the numbers are. randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
