> On Nov 2, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:18:55PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: >> I plan on covering this briefly in the GROW meeting today and uploaded the >> revised text that has been sitting in my output queue since August. >> >> This is basically codifying the fact that you MUST NOT default to "bgp >> unsafe-ebgp-policy??? for any BGP speaking device. > > There is one item I don't understand here: > > o Software MUST provide protection from internal failures preventing > the advertisement and acceptance of routes > > what does that mean (in other words "more verbose explanation, please")?
Vendor software will actually fail-open and not honor the configured policy. I’d like to try and capture this case as implementation guidance to prevent damage to the global internet. - Jared _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
