Hi Jared, If you are up to fail-open on restart (I guess this is what you mean by "internal-failures") and in fact in general regarding your entire draft IMO the only way to really enforce anything of that scope is to update 4271 with the new eBGP rules and state machine.
Otherwise I do not believe that BCP will be out of the sudden honored by vendors. Also I do not think it will be justified to be accept globally as an OS upgrade without such strong enforcement. Thx, r. > > There is one item I don't understand here: > > > > o Software MUST provide protection from internal failures preventing > > the advertisement and acceptance of routes > > > > what does that mean (in other words "more verbose explanation, please")? > > Vendor software will actually fail-open and not honor the configured > policy. I’d like to try and capture this case as implementation guidance > to prevent damage to the global internet. > > - Jared > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
