On 6/26/16 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > There has been no discussion on the GROW mailing list about having this > document published as Standards Track rather than informational and it's > coming as a surprise to see that this was only announced at IESG Last > Call a couple of days ago. At the least, there ought to be some > discussion about this before pushing it up into the publication queue.
The looking back at the document that was WGLCed (which is the current version) the state was standards track. the individual sumbission draft draft-ymbk-grow-blackholing-00 was flagged as such since initial submission. It's status therefore I think is well understood. Whether that's appropriate or not is another question. Afaik well know assignments (and there are precious few really) have been generally regarded as standards action thought the ranges is split like so. Range Registration Procedures 0xFFFF0000-0xFFFF8000 First Come First Served 0xFFFF8001-0xFFFFFFFF Standards Action
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
