Job Snijders wrote: > Do you have any more comments or concerns queued up?
I don't think the draft is well specified in terms of its intended semantics. This is a problem with a standards track document, particularly one with big scary warnings in the security considerations section. It needs to be tightened up substantially before publication could be considered. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
